Re: [squid-users] Maybe I should not have apt-get dist-upgrade

Brent Clark wrote:

> Hey all
>
> This morning I came across something most strange.
>
> I upgrade from 2.5 to 2.6 via debians apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
> I now see the following
>
> Restarting Squid HTTP proxy: squid2006/07/25 09:11:56|
> parseConfigFile: line 136 unrecognized: 'httpd_accel_host virtual'
> 2006/07/25 09:11:56| parseConfigFile: line 137 unrecognized:
> 'httpd_accel_port 80'
> 2006/07/25 09:11:56| parseConfigFile: line 138 unrecognized:
> 'httpd_accel_with_proxy on'
> 2006/07/25 09:11:56| parseConfigFile: line 139 unrecognized:
> 'httpd_accel_uses_host_header on'
> 2006/07/25 09:11:56| parseConfigFile: line 146 unrecognized:
> 'httpd_accel_single_host off'

Hello Brent Clark,

The above configuration directives are changed from squid -2.5. The
transparent proxy setup can be done by using the following directive in
squid-2.6.

http_port 172.16.1.57:8888 transparent

For more detials about squid-2.6 at :
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.6/squid-2.6.STABLE1-RELEASENOTES.html

-- 
Thanks,
Visolve Squid Team,
http://squid.visolve.com