Re: [squid-users] refresh_stale_hit -> refresh_stale_window?

From: Mark Nottingham <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:29:17 -0700

Nevermind, I just looked at cf.data.pre...

On 2006/09/11, at 3:03 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Looking through the source of P3, I *think* what's documented as
> refresh_stale_hit is actually coded as refresh_stale_window -- the
> only place the former occurs is in comments, the config file and
> the release notes, while the latter is used throughout
> client_side.c and refresh.c.
>
> Is this a known problem, and should it work to just use
> refresh_stale_window in P3?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham
> mnot@yahoo-inc.com
>
>
>
>

--
Mark Nottingham
mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Mon Sep 11 2006 - 16:29:30 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT