On 10/24/06, Mark Elsen <mark.elsen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > And it doesn't get cached? Sorry if i'm missing something.
> >
> >
>
> Whether it's get cached is unrelated to the redirector story; it depends
> on the freshness parameters of the particular object being fetched
> by squid from the remote webserver :
>
> http://www.ircache.net/cgi-bin/cacheability.py
I see what you're indicating now. So if the ultimate redirect "should
be cacheable" (according to caching law!) then it will be cached by
Squid?
So why am i not seeing that behaviour with the redirector?
>
> M.
>
Received on Tue Oct 24 2006 - 09:46:58 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MST