Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

From: Mohan <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:48:25 -0800

Chris,
    Thanks for responding. As you can see I am still confused between the
two. I thought in 2.6 Reverse proxy was replaced by InterceptionProxy.
Did I get that wrong ? I probably did!

How are the two different ? I need to be able to install a cache proxy
alongside my webserver to cache some dynamilcaaly generated pages. Which
one would be the right one ?

Again thanks for your time.

-Mohan

Chris Robertson wrote on 11/17/2006, 2:30 PM:

> Mohan wrote:
> > I am using squid 2.6 and I
> > need to setup transparent caching for a webserver running on a port
> > other than 80. We have a webserver running on port 2000 . I have spent
> > quite a number of hours trying to figure out in changing this default
> > setting. Is there a way to change this ?
> >
> >
> First off, are you really trying to do interception proxy
> (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InterceptionProxy, often mistaken
> for transparent proxy), or are you attempting acceleration
> (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ReverseProxy)?
>
> The first would likely require changes to your firewall rules. The
> latter would require changes to how Squid is set up. Hopefully your
> questions will be answered in the links provided.
>
> Chris
>

-- 
------------------------------------------
Mohan Rao
(650 937 3369) / mohansrao@aol.com
AIM : mohansrao
MBA at Santa Clara University
------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Nov 17 2006 - 15:48:48 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MST