Re: [squid-users] Squid, tproxy, nat and multi-homed

From: Adrian Chadd <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:22:44 +0800

Would you mind filing a bugzilla report with all of this in it please?

Thanks,

Adrian

On Tue, Oct 23, 2007, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
>
> From: "Ming-Ching Tiew" <mingching.tiew@redtone.com>
>
> >
> > But the fact is that as soon as I turn on squid directive,
> >
> > http_port 3128 tproxy transparent
> >
> > I will get private IP belonging to the original http web requestor
> > appearing
> > in the internet line ----- EVEN THOUGH ----- I do have a POSTROUTING
> > rule in the nat table to SNAT. As a matter of fact,
> >
> > iptables -t nat -nvL POSTROUTING
> >
> > shows that the SNAT rule has been traversed ( and the counter is
> incremented
> > ! ).
> >
>
> Just want to mention that my problem is fixed by doing this patch :-
>
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/doublenatcttproxy2patch/?branch_id=71776
>
> Regards.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Important Warning!
>
> ***************************
>
> This electronic communication (including any attached files) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is only intended for the use of the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you do not have permission to read, use, disseminate, distribute, copy or retain any part of this communication or its attachments in any form. If this e-mail was sent to you by mistake, please take the time to notify the sender so that they can identify the problem and avoid any more mistakes in sending e-mail to you. The unauthorised use of information contained in this communication or its attachments may result in legal action against any person who uses it.

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level bandwidth-capped VPSes available in WA -
Received on Tue Oct 23 2007 - 02:21:11 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Nov 01 2007 - 13:00:01 MDT