> John Doe ha scritto:
> >two disks = RAID 0 or 1
> >
> >RAID 1 is mirroring:
> > - Pros: safe (goes on even with a dead HD), fast reads (from both disks)
> > - Cons: you only use 50% of total HD space (500GB total in your case).
> >
> >RAID 0 is stripping:
> > - Pros: fast reads/writes and you use 100% of total HD (1TB)
> > - Cons: unsafe (you lose 1 HD, you lose everything).
> >
> >Or just don't use RAID and create a cache_dir on each HD...
> >Best would be RAID1 for the system and no RAID for the cache_dirs I think.
On 25.09.08 11:39, Marcello Romani wrote:
> I would add that a dead or malfunctioning drive could harm service
> uptime if the caache dirs are not on raid1.
> Therefore I would suggest keeping everything on raid1.
Hmm, is squid still unable to work if one of cache dirs has problems?
sounds like calling for bug report ;)
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 2B|!2B, that's a question!Received on Thu Sep 25 2008 - 13:58:52 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 26 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT