> >On 07.10.08 16:09, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >>Your current rule is restricting the REDIRECT to specific interface and
> >>0.0.0.0 source. not sure host that 0.0.0.0 bit works.
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >It probably has to be 0.0.0.0/0 which matches ALL IP's. 0.0.0.0/24 matches
> >only 0.0.0.* which is nearly the same as nothing.
On 08.10.08 00:27, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Can www get any confirmation on that. Because I thought the -s meant
> source-IP. And the 0.0.0.0/8 range are invalid bogons. It only makes
> sense as you say as an inverted mask.
>
> The issue could be the eth2 setting.
> Or if you are right about the 0.0.0.0/24, Matus, that bit may need
> changing to 0.0.0.0/16 or similar to catch more subnets.
I guess that had to be "0.0.0.0/0" in the meaning of "no matter what's the
source IP" as long as the selector was specified by -i option.
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.Received on Wed Oct 08 2008 - 08:33:28 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Oct 08 2008 - 12:00:02 MDT