Re: [squid-users] HTTP QoS after SQUID ?

Loic wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I have two networks (A and B). Users on network A should have internet priority over users in network B. We have a server acting as an internet gateway between A, B, and the internet; and we're using iptables and tc to do some shaping (priorizing HTTP over SMTP, A over B, etc...).
>
> This server also runs SQUID cache, which is used by both networks A and B users. The problem is that it's impossible to enforce A over B priority for HTTP using the source IP because all outbound requests come from SQUID.
>
> Having two SQUIDs (one on each network) needs additional hardware and is not planned right now.
> I have thought about setting SQUID to use different source port ranges for outbound connections (based on the network the request came from), so that I can shape packets from this information. I googled for such and SQUID config, it looks like I'm not the first to ask this question, but all I found were pieces of C code. Is there, somewhere, a configuration trick that allows to do this ?
>
> I read about delay pools, which seems to be a fallback "better than nothing" solution.
> I was thinking about doing 4 pools, something like :
> - network A, small files (html, jpg, gif, ...) : 35% of bandwidth
> - network A, big files (audio, flash, ...) : 25%
> - network B, small files : 25%
> - network B, big files : 15%
> This would work well when the network is really crowded, but - tell me if I'm wrong - it would prevent any user from network B to downloading at anything faster than 25%, even if at that time he was the only one using the link. I would prefer having any user being able to hit 100% if it doesn't disturb any one else's traffic, but still guarantee priority of A over B users at any time.
>
> Do you have other ideas that I may try to achieve my goal ?
>

http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/cfgman/tcp_outgoing_tos.html
Alternatively,
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/cfgman/tcp_outgoing_address.html.
Either option is available in 2.6 and 2.7 as well.

> Thank you for any suggestion,
>
> Lo�c
>

Chris
Received on Tue Oct 14 2008 - 20:32:00 MDT