On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Henrik Nordstrom
<henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
> m�n 2009-09-14 klockan 15:08 +0100 skrev Genaro Flores:
>
>> Ah, thanks. I reckon there have been no changes since I last asked the
>> question. Although 'purge' does look promising (except for efficiency and
>> that I doubt it can do anything to decrease the time required to perform
>> multiple queries).
>
> This is because there is no searchable index with the data you look for.
> So each object has to be opened to find the exact properties.
>
> The Squid cache index is keyed on an MD5 hash of the URL (16 bytes
> "random" data), not even preserving the requested hostname in a
> meaningful manner.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
Henrik,
Yes, the squid process is running and there is no problem.
I don't see anything fishy in the cache.log either. I post the
contents of cache.log soon.
Avinash
Received on Tue Sep 15 2009 - 05:42:16 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 15 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT