Re: [squid-users] Recent Polygraph results for Squid?

Le Lundi 15 F�vrier 2010 05:35:47, Oborn, Keith a �crit :
> Hi all -
>
> We used to be a heavy user of commercial forward proxy/cache products,
> but with the demise of the NetApp line we stopped that activity.
>
> However, I'm now looking for an initial steer on a good large-scale
> forward proxy setup (multi-gigabit rates, hundreds of thousands of
> users). Unfortunately, our Polygraph rig was also scrapped some time ago
> (boxes died-), and it will take time and resource to build a new one.
>
> Sadly, the isp-caching and web-polygraph lists seem to be dead
> nowadays-.
>
> I'd be very interested in any numbers at all - most particularly on
> recent Sun kit, as it looks as if ZFS is a good bet for Squid. I must
> admit I alway hankered after testing a proxy/cache on a Thumper (X4540)
> because of the huge spindle density.
>
> At present, any numbers that get me within like a factor of two of
> actual performance on any modern X86 server hardware would be great (and
> perhaps any idea if using Sun T-series helps - does Squid like lots of
> threads?) - that will enable us to decide whether it is worth setting up
> to run our own detailed tests. I will, of course, post any test results
> we produce if we go down that road.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
>
> Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
>
> This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally
> privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If
> you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system:
> its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions
> expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any
> representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract.
>
> Registered office: 160 Great Portland Street, London W1W 5QA.
> Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
> ===========================================================================
> ===
I donnt know if my implementation is bigger than yours, but we have
3 linux x86 boxes (xeon 2.3gz+32gbram each) supporing 5000 users with next
navigation chars:

object mean size: 17kb
hits/min: 4500 (each server)

If you are worry about squid capacity take my data as a reference.

LD
Received on Mon Feb 15 2010 - 22:06:51 MST