Re: [squid-users] cache_object://$host/info confusion

From: david robertson <dr_at_nevernet.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:32:29 -0500

I'll file one when I get a chance.

So, back to the original question though - out of those two stats, on
a memory caching only server, which one should be correct? Request
Memory Hit or Request Hit?

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:59:56 -0500, david robertson wrote:
>>>> I'm in the process of writing a script to give me some cache hit
>>>> statistics for my cluster. �There's some confusion on the cache_object
>>>> info output, though. �For example, this particular host only caches to
>>>> memory, however this is the output I get:
>>>>
>>>> � � � � Request Hit Ratios: � � 5min: 40.0%, 60min: 39.2%
>>>> � � � � Request Memory Hit Ratios: � � �5min: 69.7%, 60min: 69.6%
>>>>
>>>> For a host that's only caching to memory, there's a pretty large
>>>> discrepancy between the two listed above. �What's the difference
>>>> between the two above?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Squid version? and how did you make it "memory only"?
>>>
>
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:32:57 -0500, david robertson wrote:
>> Sorry:
>> Squid Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE9-20101104
>>
>> The frontend servers only cache to memory, via
>> cache_dir null /dev/null
>>
>
> Okay. Thats correct, so its possibly a bug of some sort then.
>
> Amos
>
Received on Wed Nov 10 2010 - 04:32:53 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Nov 10 2010 - 12:00:03 MST