Thanks for the hint!
I'll check it too.
I think, we should also replace the ip dsts within all of the intermediate
caches by domain names
thus saving all of the unnecessary dns lookups (about 80% --> Internet).
Yes, we have a local caching dns.
----- Urspr�ngliche Mail ----
Von: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer_at_ec.hadorhabaac.com>
An: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Gesendet: Samstag, den 30. April 2011, 12:39:56 Uhr
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the
last one need to resolve URLs?
On 30/04/2011 11:58, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote:
> OK, I see!
>
> Thanks very much!
dont you have a local caching dns?
if you dont it's one of the basics recommendations.
and another good thing is to change the udp and tcp times on the linux
kernel\sysctl.
i dont remember the basic TCP settings for close_wait and others but they are
way too much for any usage i know.
also the udp ones are way to high for dns and other services and a faster
network then a 5 MB.
Eliezer
Received on Mon May 02 2011 - 09:32:36 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 03 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT