Re: [squid-users] Reverse Proxy - order of cache_peer_access rules

From: Oskar Stolc <oskar.stolc_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:28:55 +0100

Hi Amos,

thanks for the clarification. I've re-ordered my cache_peer rules and
all works now as expected.

Thank you,
Oskar

> Selection is based on cache_peer directive order.
>
> cache_peer_access is just a modifier to prevent particular selection choices
> being made.
>
> "server1 allow site1" permits all site1, regardless of ocode_param.
>
>
> Solution is to either add !ocode_param to each of the server1 and server2
> access allows, or move cache_peer for server3 to the top.
>
> Amos
> --
> Please be using
> �Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12
> �Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.9 and 3.1.12.3
>
Received on Tue Jun 28 2011 - 19:29:02 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 29 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT