hi Pieter
this is my configuration file,
#define access list for network
acl my_network src 192.168.12.0/24
acl my_network src 192.168.7.0/24
acl my_network src 192.168.40.0/24
acl my_network src 10.10.10.0/24
#allow http access for the network
http_access allow my_network
#squid default acl configuration
acl all src all
acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/32
acl to_localhost dst 127.0.0.0/8
acl SSL_ports port 443
acl Safe_ports port 80
acl Safe_ports port 21
acl Safe_ports port 443
acl Safe_ports port 70
acl Safe_ports port 210
acl Safe_ports port 1025-65535
acl Safe_ports port 280
acl Safe_ports port 488
acl Safe_ports port 591
acl Safe_ports port 777
acl CONNECT method CONNECT
http_access deny !Safe_ports
http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_ports
http_access deny all
http_port 3128 intercept
http_port 8080
#cache configuration
#define core dump directory
visible_hostname squidtest
coredump_dir /var/coredump
#define cache replacement policy
memory_replacement_policy heap GDSF
cache_replacement_policy heap LFUDA
#define cache memory
cache_mem 512 MB
#define squid log files
access_log /var/log/squid3/access.log
emulate_httpd_log off
cache_store_log none
#include /etc/squid3/refresh.conf
cache_log /var/log/squid3/cache.log
#define cache direcotry
cache_dir aufs /var/squid/aufs1 5000 16 256
cache_dir aufs /var/squid/aufs2 5000 16 256
cache_dir aufs /var/squid/aufs3 5000 16 256
maximum_object_size 512 MB
ipcache_size 5120
cache_swap_low 85
cache_swap_high 95
cache_mgr [email protected]
cachemgr_passwd xxxxx all
thank you with my best regards
--- On Thu, 2/2/12, Pieter De Wit <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Pieter De Wit <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] forward loop
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, February 2, 2012, 10:08 AM
> Hi Mustafa,
>
> Can you please post your squid.conf ? (Remove all comments
> and passwords
> etc)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pieter
>
> On 2/02/2012 23:04, Mustafa Raji wrote:
> > hi
> > please i have a forward loop warning in my cache.log
> what is the cause of it
> > i check the internet and find the cause is using peer
> squid configuration and the two cache server has the same
> visible_hostname but i never used the peer in my
> configuration i have one cache server with intercept
> configuration please can you tell me what is causes to the
> cache forward loop the warning message is from cache.log
> >
> > 2012/02/02 12:02:23| WARNING: Forwarding loop detected
> for:
> > POST
> /2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bnpuss,ConnType=KeepAlive
> HTTP/1.1
> > Accept: */*
> > Content-Type: application/octet-stream
> > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Win32)
> > UserAgent: blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com
> > Content-Length: 22
> > Pragma: no-cache
> > Expires: 0
> > Host: 192.168.40.2:3128
> > Via: 1.0 squidtest (squid/3.1.11), 1.1 squidtest
> (squid/3.1.11), 1.1 squidtest (squid/3.1.11)
> > X-Forwarded-For: 192.168.40.1, 192.168.40.2,
> 192.168.40.2
> > Cache-Control: no-cache, max-age=0
> > Connection: keep-alive
> >
> > and this error continues to appear with increasing the
> values of via and x-forward-for
> > my access.log file show this information at the same
> time of the loop
> > the ip 192.168.40.2 is the CacheServer ip
> >
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:23 2012� � � 0
> 192.168.40.1 TCP_IMS_HIT/304 287 GET http://crl.microsoft.com/pki/crl/products/WinPCA.crl -
> NONE/- application/pkix-crl
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012� � 898
> 192.168.40.1 TCP_MISS/400 237 POST http://65.55.122.232/ - DIRECT/65.55.122.232 -
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012� � � 8
> 192.168.40.2 NONE/400 69168 NONE error:request-too-large -
> NONE/- text/html
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���19 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 69275 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���23 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 69377 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���26 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 69479 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���30 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 69581 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���34 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 69683 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���37 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 69785 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���41 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 69887 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���44 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 69989 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���48 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 70091 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���51 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 70193 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���55 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 70295 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> > Thu Feb� 2 12:02:24 2012�
> ���58 192.168.40.2 TCP_MISS/400 70397 POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/n7hngumkwg46fvvc2zuwzzcd6y43i3da4bn$
> >
> >
> >
> > after that this status appear to me in cache.log
> >
> > 2012/02/02 12:02:33| statusIfComplete: Request not yet
> fully sent "POST http://192.168.40.2:3128/2.0/blugro2relay.groove.microsoft.com/3m4dy9mseq7e9h39xecabcaqj24zjcgw4zts55s,ConnType=LongLived"
> >
> > and in 12:02:35 the server is return to work normally
> >
> > please can you help me in finding what is the cause of
> this warning
>
>
Received on Sat Feb 04 2012 - 07:02:48 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Feb 04 2012 - 12:00:02 MST