On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:51:08 +0100
Lo�c BLOT wrote:
> Yes, but i'm not satisfied of performances. FFS is too slow for high
> used squid and the performance gain is visible.
> It's right i use redundant cache under memory, but it's only a 4Gbit
> cache (then 8Gbit).
AFAIK they're exclusive caches.
> Maybe it will be useful to remove disk_cache, but is this possible ?
It is, and unless you stop and start the daemon a lot, that's probably
better than what you're doing at the moment.
Also once you've transferred the mfs memory to squid, you *may* be able
to add a real disk cache because of the reduced load on the disk. I'd
try starting with a small diskd cache just to see if ffs can cope
with the base load of objects evicted from the memory cache.
Received on Thu Jan 24 2013 - 23:58:47 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 25 2013 - 12:00:05 MST