Re: [squid-users] Which squid to use?

Steve Snyder wrote:

> On Tuesday 22 January 2002 04:30 pm, Joe Cooper wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>Seriously though, Squid 2.4STABLE3 is pretty good, and what I'm
>>deploying today. 2.2STABLE5+hno is still faster, and more stable in
>>most environments, as well...but none the less the feature set of
>>2.4STABLE3 is enough better that it's worth giving up a little speed.
>>
>
> Given your confident tone about 2.4STABLE3 (which I agree with), why did
> you run a beta version of Squid 2.5 in the 4th Cache-Off?

Why not? Cacheoffs should be interesting, and what's more interesting than

running nearly untested software?

 From another perspective, I have reason to believe that 2.5 will be a
better Squid than 2.4 (maybe not much faster--but more useful, and
probably less prone to certain types of bugs).

-- 
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
http://www.swelltech.com
Web Caching Appliances and Support