Re: [squid-users] Squid being slow more than a direct connection

From: Mauro <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 01:09:05 +0200

> The second most common cause is improperly tuned Squid installation,
> such as using the ufs cache_dir type on a high request rate Squid
> proxy (trying to use the ufs cache_dir type for request rates above
> 30 requests/s is not recommendable, use diskd or aufs instead)

So in general it's better to use diskd or aufs?
I am using ufs.

Mauro
Received on Sat May 24 2003 - 17:07:15 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Squid being slow more than a direct connection"
Previous message: Chris Knipe: "[squid-users] HEEEELLLPPPP"
In reply to: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Squid being slow more than a direct connection"
Next in thread: Sarky: "Re: [squid-users] Squid being slow more than a direct connection"
Reply: Sarky: "Re: [squid-users] Squid being slow more than a direct connection"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:01 MST